Posts

TL;DR A 109-day project plan. One day of actual work. Eight hours of active pipeline time. The key was treating planning and implementation as two separate AI-driven phases: spend an evening getting the plan right by routing it through multiple models, then let Claude Sonnet 4.6 implement it autonomously overnight via GitHub Copilot’s cloud agent while you sleep. This is the full playbook — planning phase included. The Project This came out of building dnd-multi, a full-stack AI Dungeon Master platform: FastAPI backend, Next.js 15 frontend, a Discord bot, LiveKit voice, and AWS Bedrock integration. Seven feature phases, a plan projected to take until June 19. ...

TL;DR I’m building a multiplayer D&D platform where an AI powered by AWS Bedrock Claude runs the game. Players connect via a Next.js web app or Discord. A 5-tier lore context system gives the AI persistent memory across sessions. A background world simulation engine tracks NPC positions, inventory, faction standings, and in-game time so the AI can focus on storytelling instead of bookkeeping. The foundation is fully deployed on my home k3s cluster. The current work is turning a working tech demo into a game people actually want to sit down and play. ...

TL;DR I added a standardized environment.instructions.md file to every repository in my workspace. It’s a simple Markdown table of tool versions plus a few workflow snippets. AI assistants pick it up automatically, and they’ve stopped suggesting commands for tools or versions I don’t have. The whole thing took less than an hour to write out and propagate. The problem I run GitHub Copilot heavily across several projects — homelab infrastructure, a blog, a few Python services, and some supporting tooling. The AI context setup (those copilot-instructions.md files I wrote about here) covers what each project does and what its conventions are. What it doesn’t cover is what I’m actually running when I type commands in a terminal. ...

TL;DR A $20/month GitHub Copilot subscription gives you Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-4o, and Gemini inside VS Code. Out of the box it’s useful. With a proper instruction setup — a copilot-instructions.md file, path-scoped rules, and skill documents — it becomes something you actually rely on. Most of the posts on this blog were built with this toolchain, mostly in the context of my k3s cluster, but the patterns apply anywhere. This is how I have it set up. ...

TL;DR The .github/copilot-instructions.md file started as 10 lines of project description and grew into a 99-line “operating system” for AI assistants. Then it split: failure patterns moved into docs/ai-lessons.md (now 482 lines across 20+ categories), and file-type-specific rules moved into .github/instructions/ with applyTo glob patterns. The same template structure was standardized across 5 repositories. This post traces the three generations of AI instruction architecture and shows how every production incident permanently improves AI reliability. ...

TL;DR Grafana went completely dark for about 26 hours on my home k3s cluster. Two things broke simultaneously: Loki entered CrashLoopBackOff, and Prometheus silently stopped ingesting metrics — its pods showed as healthy and 2/2 Running the whole time. The actual cause was Longhorn’s auto-balancer migrating replicas onto a freshly-added cluster node (k3s-agent-4) that had unstable storage during its first 48 hours. The replica I/O errors propagated directly into the workloads, corrupting mid-write files: a Prometheus WAL segment and a Loki TSDB index file. Both required offline surgery via a busybox pod to delete the corrupted files before the services could recover. ...

TL;DR I run Wiki.js on k3s as the cluster’s internal knowledge base. It is not a place I write documentation — it is a place the AI writes documentation after completing work. When Claude finishes deploying a service, debugging an incident, or refactoring infrastructure, it commits the results to the wiki with architecture diagrams, decision rationale, and operational notes. I am the primary reader. When I want to understand how something works, or why a specific decision was made three weeks ago, I go to the wiki instead of digging through git history or re-reading code. ...

TL;DR The AI memory system I built three weeks ago started causing the problem it was designed to solve: context window exhaustion. Five generic Claude skills — duplicated identically across all 5 repositories in my workspace — consumed 401KB (~100K tokens) of potential context. The gh-cli skill alone was 40KB per copy, accounting for 42% of all skill content. I ran a full audit, deleted 25 duplicate files, and documented the anti-pattern to prevent recurrence. ...

TL;DR Upgraded a production k3s cluster from v1.29.0+k3s1 to v1.34.4+k3s1 across 8 nodes — 3 control plane servers, 4 amd64 worker agents, and 1 arm64 Lima VM agent. The upgrade stepped through every minor version (v1.29 → v1.30 → v1.31 → v1.32 → v1.33 → v1.34) with etcd snapshots between each step. Longhorn was upgraded from v1.6.0 to v1.8.2 in two stages (v1.7.3 as an intermediate step). SSH was broken to all cluster nodes, so the entire upgrade was done via Proxmox QEMU Guest Agent (qm guest exec) and Lima CLI (limactl shell). Discovered that k3s intentionally pins Traefik to v2.11.24 even when bundling Helm chart v27 — Traefik v3 migration is a separate effort. ...

TL;DR Two weeks of building a production Kubernetes cluster with AI pair programming. Claude Opus 4.6 handles complex multi-step infrastructure work via the CLI. GitHub Copilot provides inline code completion in VS Code. AWS Bedrock (Nova Micro, Claude Sonnet 4.5) powers runtime AI services inside the cluster. The key discovery: AI tools without persistent memory are dangerous. Every session starts from zero. The same bugs get recreated, the same anti-patterns get suggested, the same cluster-specific constraints get forgotten. The solution is the “Memory Protocol” – a set of documentation files the AI reads before every session and updates after every discovery. ...